Concentration · example portfolio

FAANG, and nothing else.

The acronym that defined a decade of retail investing. Five companies, one theme. The engine puts a number on how much of the outcome depends on that theme.

The portfolio

  • META20%
  • AAPL20%
  • AMZN20%
  • NFLX20%
  • GOOGL20%

Weights as shown, Medium risk profile. Re-scored automatically about once a week; the date and engine version are on the result.

Portfolio score Neutral

Mixed evidence.

The components disagree with each other. Read them separately rather than trusting the single number.

Weak Neutral Good Strong

5 holdings resolved · Medium risk profile · engine 2026-03-07-v5 · trajectory stable (9% confidence)

What is a good score? → Score your own portfolio
Largest position
20.0% META · limit 30%
Effective positions
5.0 of 5 held · target 8
Top sector
60.0% Communication Services
Weighted beta
1.31 market sensitivity
Exposure plan
74% invested 26% cash · balanced
You are at
100% invested 0% cash

Component scores

  • Diversification74
  • Risk balance98
  • Quality61
  • Signal68
  • Trend36
  • Market context0

A component is “no data” when the engine lacks evidence for it, which is reported rather than guessed.

What to look at first

  1. Watch One sector dominates

    Communication Services is 60.0% of invested value. When one sector carries that much weight, a single macro theme drives most of the outcome.

  2. Watch Fewer effective positions than it looks

    Position sizing gives this portfolio the concentration of about 5.0 equally weighted holdings, below the profile target.

  3. Watch The exposure plan favours a cash buffer

    Given current signal, trend and concentration evidence, the plan targets about 74.1% invested and 25.9% cash, deployed at a gradual pace.

  4. Watch Limited factor evidence

    Factor evidence is missing for 100.0% of invested value, which limits how much forward-looking context the engine can support.

  5. Watch Forward-looking confidence is limited

    Lens confidence averages 56.0%. Treat the trend and market-context components as provisional.

  6. Priority Sizeable positions with weak readings

    GOOGL carry material weight and low holding scores. They are the largest drag on the composite.

Holdings

Ticker Sector Value Weight Signal Score Profile
META Communication Services 20,000 20.0% HOLD 0.60 core
AAPL Technology 20,000 20.0% BUY 6.20 core
AMZN Consumer Cyclical 20,000 20.0% HOLD -0.98 high beta
NFLX Communication Services 20,000 20.0% HOLD 0.50 high beta
GOOGL Communication Services 20,000 20.0% HOLD -1.80 turnaround

Evidence limits:

  • Missing dividend quality data for part of the portfolio
  • Weak stock-type classification confidence for part of the portfolio
  • Missing lens-specific factor evidence for large parts of the portfolio
  • Weak factor evidence confidence reduces forward-looking reliability

About this report. PORTIQA outputs are quantitative analysis for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Scores describe portfolio structure and current evidence at the time stated above; they do not predict returns. Full disclaimer: portiqa.ai/legal/disclaimer.html · Methodology: portiqa.ai/methodology

POST https://portiqa.ai/evaluate

Every number in this report came from one API call. Same engine on every plan, JSON in and out, five free evaluations a month with an API key. Documentation: portiqa.ai/docs/

PORTIQA outputs are quantitative analysis for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. See the financial disclaimer.

More example portfolios

All example portfolios · How the score is calculated · What is a good score?

Your portfolio, same engine.

No account needed to analyse. Holdings are saved only when you choose to save them.