Concentration · example portfolio

The Magnificent 7 as a portfolio.

Seven of the largest companies in the world, held in equal amounts. It looks diversified because there are seven names. The engine measures what the seven names have in common.

The portfolio

  • AAPL14%
  • MSFT14%
  • GOOGL14%
  • AMZN14%
  • NVDA14%
  • META14%
  • TSLA14%

Weights as shown, Medium risk profile. Re-scored automatically about once a week; the date and engine version are on the result.

Portfolio score Neutral

Mixed evidence.

The components disagree with each other. Read them separately rather than trusting the single number.

Weak Neutral Good Strong

7 holdings resolved · Medium risk profile · engine 2026-03-07-v5 · trajectory deteriorating (27% confidence)

What is a good score? → Score your own portfolio
Largest position
14.3% AAPL · limit 30%
Effective positions
7.0 of 7 held · target 8
Top sector
42.9% Technology
Weighted beta
1.45 market sensitivity
Exposure plan
71% invested 30% cash · balanced
You are at
100% invested 0% cash

Component scores

  • Diversification94
  • Risk balance93
  • Quality61
  • Signal53
  • Trend31
  • Market context0

A component is “no data” when the engine lacks evidence for it, which is reported rather than guessed.

What to look at first

  1. Watch One sector dominates

    Technology is 42.9% of invested value. When one sector carries that much weight, a single macro theme drives most of the outcome.

  2. Priority The exposure plan favours a cash buffer

    Given current signal, trend and concentration evidence, the plan targets about 70.5% invested and 29.5% cash, deployed at a gradual pace.

  3. Watch Weighted holding score is low

    The value-weighted score across holdings is 0.13. The mix leans on names with weak readings.

  4. Watch Limited factor evidence

    Factor evidence is missing for 100.0% of invested value, which limits how much forward-looking context the engine can support.

  5. Watch Forward-looking confidence is limited

    Lens confidence averages 55.1%. Treat the trend and market-context components as provisional.

  6. Priority Sizeable positions with weak readings

    NVDA, GOOGL carry material weight and low holding scores. They are the largest drag on the composite.

Holdings

Ticker Sector Value Weight Signal Score Profile
AAPL Technology 10,000 14.3% BUY 6.20 core
MSFT Technology 10,000 14.3% HOLD 1.36 core
GOOGL Communication Services 10,000 14.3% HOLD -1.80 turnaround
AMZN Consumer Cyclical 10,000 14.3% HOLD -0.98 high beta
NVDA Technology 10,000 14.3% SELL -4.47 high beta
META Communication Services 10,000 14.3% HOLD 0.60 core
TSLA Consumer Cyclical 10,000 14.3% HOLD 0.02 high beta

Evidence limits:

  • Missing dividend quality data for part of the portfolio
  • Weak stock-type classification confidence for part of the portfolio
  • Missing lens-specific factor evidence for large parts of the portfolio
  • Weak factor evidence confidence reduces forward-looking reliability

About this report. PORTIQA outputs are quantitative analysis for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Scores describe portfolio structure and current evidence at the time stated above; they do not predict returns. Full disclaimer: portiqa.ai/legal/disclaimer.html · Methodology: portiqa.ai/methodology

POST https://portiqa.ai/evaluate

Every number in this report came from one API call. Same engine on every plan, JSON in and out, five free evaluations a month with an API key. Documentation: portiqa.ai/docs/

PORTIQA outputs are quantitative analysis for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. See the financial disclaimer.

More example portfolios

All example portfolios · How the score is calculated · What is a good score?

Your portfolio, same engine.

No account needed to analyse. Holdings are saved only when you choose to save them.