Index · example portfolio

Nothing but ETFs.

Six funds covering most of the investable world. The interesting part is what the engine reports as missing: fund-level holdings carry less evidence than single stocks, and the score is honest about that.

The portfolio

  • VOO25%
  • QQQ20%
  • VEA15%
  • VWO10%
  • BND20%
  • GLD10%

Weights as shown, Medium risk profile. Re-scored automatically about once a week; the date and engine version are on the result.

Funds are treated as individual positions. Underlying holdings and overlap between funds are not analysed; concentration figures describe fund allocations, not diversification across underlying issuers. How the score works

Portfolio score

Fund-level analysis: underlying holdings are not analysed

This score treats each ETF as one position. It does not analyse the securities inside the funds or overlap between funds. Concentration figures describe the allocation between funds, not diversification across underlying issuers. The score and suggestions are limited by this missing detail.

6 holdings resolved · Medium risk profile · engine 2026-03-07-v5

What is a good score? → Score your own portfolio
Largest position
25.0% VOO
Effective positions
5.4 of 6 held
Weighted beta
0.96 market sensitivity
You are at
100% invested 0% cash

Component scores

  • Risk balance87
  • Quality38
  • Signal27
  • Trend11

A component is “no data” when the engine lacks evidence for it, which is reported rather than guessed.

What to look at first

  1. Priority Material weight in negative-signal holdings

    35.0% of invested value sits in holdings with a negative signal reading, above what the profile tolerates.

  2. Watch Weighted holding score is low

    The value-weighted score across holdings is -1.15. The mix leans on names with weak readings.

  3. Priority Sizeable positions with weak readings

    QQQ, VEA, GLD carry material weight and low holding scores. They are the largest drag on the composite.

Holdings

Ticker Sector Value Weight Signal Score Profile
VOO — 25,000 25.0% HOLD 0.29 fund
QQQ — 20,000 20.0% SELL -2.32 fund
BND — 20,000 20.0% HOLD -0.96 fund
VEA — 15,000 15.0% SELL -2.29 fund
VWO — 10,000 10.0% HOLD -0.48 fund
GLD — 10,000 10.0% HOLD -1.73 fund

Evidence limits:

  • Missing grade data for part of the portfolio
  • Missing dividend quality data for part of the portfolio
  • Weak factor evidence confidence reduces forward-looking reliability

About this report. PORTIQA outputs are quantitative analysis for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Scores describe portfolio structure and current evidence at the time stated above; they do not predict returns. Full disclaimer: portiqa.ai/legal/disclaimer.html · Methodology: portiqa.ai/methodology

POST https://portiqa.ai/evaluate

Every number in this report came from one API call. Same engine on every plan, JSON in and out, five free evaluations a month with an API key. Documentation: portiqa.ai/docs/

PORTIQA outputs are quantitative analysis for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. See the financial disclaimer.

More example portfolios

All example portfolios · How the score is calculated · What is a good score?

Your portfolio, same engine.

No account needed to analyse. Holdings are saved only when you choose to save them.